The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has initiated legal action in France and Belgium, accusing Apple subsidiaries of involvement in the use of conflict minerals. Acting on behalf of the Congolese government, lawyers have alleged that Apple is complicit in crimes associated with armed groups controlling mineral-rich mines in eastern DRC.
The complaints center on allegations that Apple’s supply chain includes tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold sourced from conflict zones. These materials, often referred to as “blood minerals,” are said to fund militias and terrorist groups, perpetuating cycles of violence, forced child labor, and environmental destruction.
In a statement, Congolese government representatives claimed these materials are laundered through international supply chains, eventually ending up in consumer electronics. 
Apple’s Response
Apple has strongly denied the allegations, asserting its commitment to responsible sourcing. A company spokesperson emphasized that Apple holds its suppliers to rigorous standards and has implemented measures to prevent the use of conflict minerals.
“As conflict in the region escalated earlier this year, we informed our suppliers that smelters and refiners must suspend sourcing tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold from the DRC and Rwanda unless they could ensure independent audits and certification,” the spokesperson said.
A Longstanding Issue in the Region
Eastern DRC is a key source of critical minerals used in global electronics manufacturing. However, the extraction and trade of these resources have fueled decades of conflict in the region. Rights groups have frequently reported that minerals from both legitimate mines and those controlled by armed groups are smuggled into neighboring countries, such as Rwanda, before entering global supply chains.
Rwanda has dismissed the DRC’s legal action against Apple as a “media stunt” and denied involvement in selling conflict minerals to the company.
Next Steps
Authorities in France and Belgium are now tasked with determining whether sufficient evidence exists to advance the legal proceedings. The outcome could have significant implications for global supply chain practices and accountability in the tech industry.
This case highlights ongoing challenges in ensuring ethical sourcing of critical materials, particularly in regions affected by conflict and instability.
