The absence of stars in NASA’s space walk videos is a glaring anomaly that has fueled skepticism and conspiracy theories about the authenticity of space exploration. This omission, along with other inconsistencies, has led many to question the legitimacy of NASA’s missions and the vast resources poured into them. Let’s delve into the details that support the notion that NASA might be staging its space missions.
The Missing Stars
One of the most compelling arguments against the authenticity of NASA’s space walk videos is the conspicuous absence of stars in the background. In reality, space is a vast, star-filled expanse, yet in many of NASA’s videos, the black background is completely devoid of stars. This anomaly is particularly noticeable in videos where astronauts are supposed to be floating in the void of space. The lack of stars suggests that these videos might have been filmed in a controlled environment, such as a studio, rather than in the actual vacuum of space 1,2,3
Low-Quality Content Despite Billions in Budget
Another glaring issue is the quality of the footage provided by NASA. Despite having a budget in the billions, many of NASA’s live videos are of remarkably low quality, often in 728px format. This discrepancy between the immense funding and the subpar visual quality has raised eyebrows and led to speculation about where the money is actually being spent. Critics argue that if NASA truly had the technology to explore space, the visual evidence would be of much higher quality, capturing the vastness and beauty of the cosmos 4,5,6
CGI and Studio Settings
The theory that NASA’s videos are computer-generated imagery (CGI) or filmed in studio settings is supported by several observations. The sun often appears unnaturally bright and distorted in these videos, unlike its natural appearance in space. Additionally, the behavior of objects in these videos, such as the way shadows are cast and the movement of astronauts, does not always align with the laws of physics as they would apply in a zero-gravity environment 7,8,9
The 300-Meter Altitude Theory
Some conspiracy theorists suggest that NASA’s missions might only reach altitudes of around 300 meters above Earth, rather than venturing into true space. This theory is based on the observation that many of NASA’s videos and photographs could have been taken from a high-altitude balloon or aircraft, rather than from space. The lack of visible stars, the presence of a visible atmosphere, and the behavior of objects in these videos all support the idea that they might not be as high up as NASA claims 10,11,12
The Sun’s Unnatural Appearance
The depiction of the sun in NASA’s videos is often cited as evidence of manipulation. The sun appears unusually bright and sometimes distorted, unlike its natural appearance in space. This unnatural portrayal, along with other visual inconsistencies, suggests that the videos might have been enhanced or entirely created using CGI to achieve a desired effect 13,14,15
Conclusion
The anomalies in NASA’s space walk videos, including the absence of stars, low video quality, potential use of CGI, and the unnatural appearance of the sun, have led many to question the authenticity of space exploration as presented by NASA. These inconsistencies, combined with the vast resources allocated to the agency, raise serious doubts about whether NASA is truly exploring space or staging elaborate hoaxes to maintain its prestige and funding. The theory that NASA is fake invites us to reconsider the nature of space exploration and the true extent of human achievement in this domain.
